This is a $6B operation where there's a will, there's a way. The team has previously downed any possibility using "Red" because of trademarks, but come on. president? "Majors" is more military-aligned, but it packs more of a concise punch than "Commanders," doubling as a statement of status among NFL teams. ties they're half-heartedly evoking with "Commanders," but in today's polarizing political climate, do they care to be associated with every sitting U.S. "Presidents" would give them the commanding D.C. So what on Earth should the new name be? Primarily using possibilities that appeared on team president Jason Wright's survey sent to season-ticket-holders during Washington's last rebranding, here are our XYZ favorites: 5. "We'll see where we are with the name, but I can't say right now."ĮSPN has since reported that it's "reasonable" to expect the new regime to erase as many branding flourishes from the Snyder era as possible, which would seem to suggest Washington will, in fact, sport a different name sooner rather than later. "I think everything's on the table, especially after this year," Johnson told "The Today Show" after Joshua Harris' purchasing group bought the Commanders for a record $6 billion. Just over a year later, with Daniel Snyder selling the team amid controversy, new ownership is already teasing another makeover, with minority stakeholder Earvin "Magic" Johnson hinting this week that another new nickname could come as early as 2024. Washington's NFL franchise recently spent two years with a temporary nickname and 18 months officially deliberating its current identity, finally arriving on " Commanders" as the club's new branding in February 2022.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |